National Center for Rights
Helsinkidog@gmail.com                                                                    Even if the children complain, who will listen?

THE ORIGINAL FILING ON COMPLIANT FORMS:

The attachments show the prior legal history. On 11 February 2014, Ross was taken into custody. The first claim was that Ross had stolen National Security Documents, the second claim was that Ross stole Maryland State Police Murphy's money. If either had probable cause, Ross would have been charged with the crime in 2008 when they claim the crimes occurred. Certainly by 2016, there was enough time to file charges. 

After six weeks in custody without charge, Ross was instructed that Finland had a "process" by which compliance with the Anti-Trafficking Convention was administered. Ross complied, and cooperated with that process. That is what is shown in the documents right.  

However, that process is sham. It is designed to make nothing happen, refuse a report to Interpol, and ensure the election of Ms. Clinton.   Thus the documents created by Finland not do they not comply with the law, they wholly falsely report the facts and evidence of the case shown on the following pages below. 

No children were allowed to testify. 
No police officers were allowed to testify.
No Court officers were allowed to testify.
No photographic evidence was transferred to the court.
No wiretap evidence was transferred. 
No hearing before a judge. (The judge's clerk heard the case).
No evidence concerning the direct threats by US Officials against Ross safety was permitted to be substantiated. 
Ross' lawyer was not permitted to translate any of the documents. 
So argument that Finland conducted a hearing and can express an opinion on the credibility of the children and evidence is sham. 

Ross is clearly:
1)  a member of a group who rescued children, 
2) testified against the perpetrators, and 
3) suffered material retaliation given the physical attacks on Ross designed to prevent him from placing evidence in court, and suspension of his basic civil rights given the NSA Court order saying Ross' basic civil rights (seizure of his home, his money, his future income - claiming that the order is not reformable by bankruptcy - are suspended "even when a litigant alleges that a state violated federal constitutional principles…."  See Seal 1 et al v. Seal 3 et al. RDB-13-153 (13 February, Dist. Ct, MD. 2013)

Ross is not a refugee - Ross has been held involuntarily without a passport, and banned from Europe to stop the prosecution of this case. Ross is certainly in custody when Finland in 2016 refuses to return Ross' passport so Ross can peaceably leave. Instead, Finland seeks to forcibly ship Ross to Algeria.